Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Tarpley v. Moyer et al
as 1:2015cv01132
Plaintiff:
Steven E. Tarpley
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Bobby P. Shearin, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friend v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00267
Plaintiff:
Johnny M. Friend
Defendant:
P. Johnson and T. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henson v. Friend et al
as 1:2014cv03825
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert M. Friend, Frank B. Bishop, Jr. and J Phillip Morgan, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henson v. Wilt et al
as 1:2014cv03724
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bradley A. Wilt, Walter Iser, Brian Iames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall et al v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv03479
Plaintiff:
Gregory Marshall
Defendant:
C. Miller, Troutman, N. Soltos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purdy v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2014cv00240
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Corbet, Jeffrey Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony P. Purdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Bishop et al
as 1:2014cv02131
Plaintiff:
James A. Henson, Jr.
Defendant:
Frank B. Bishop, Jr., William E. Miller, Robert M. Friend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Friend et al
as 9:2013cv00119
Plaintiff:
Luvanisha D Williams
Defendant:
John M. Friend and Celadon Trucking Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv02171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
James Henson, Jr. v. Lieutenant Likin
as 12-6816
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES A. HENSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT LIKIN, SERGEANT MERLIN, J. YOMMER and others
Party-in-Interest:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
