Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Richard v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 9:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Willis Richard
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, Lucien J. LeClaire, Harold Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Woodard et al
as 1:2014cv00067
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Toemica M. Woodard, Unknown Spouse and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Woodard v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2014cv00643
Plaintiff:
Monica M Woodard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Woodard et al
as 3:2014cv00566
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Nancy M Woodard and Dennis R Woodard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Eugenia Woodard v. Texas Southern University
as 13-20256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENIA M. WOODARD
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
Woodard v. Texas Southern University
as 4:2013cv00337
Plaintiff:
Eugenia M. Woodard
Defendant:
Texas Southern University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Woodard v. Texas Southern University
as 4:2013mc00199
Plaintiff:
Eugenia M. Woodard
Defendant:
Texas Southern University
Woodward v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv02189
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Woodard
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
United States of America v. Woodard et al
as 2:2012cv00136
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shane D. Woodard, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Any Tenants or Occupants Residing At 97 Sunnyview Drive, Jericho, VT 05465 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Michelle M Woodard et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv09033
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Does
Plaintiff:
James Rahman and Michelle M Woodard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
