Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Boyd et al v. Barnett Outdoors LLC
as 2:2021cv01448
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd and Tina M Boyd
Defendant:
Barnett Outdoors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD v. RIGGS DISTLER AND COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2020cv14008
Defendant:
RIGGS DISTLER AND COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rhyme v. Sieber et al
as 1:2020cv05161
Defendant:
Anton White, ALEJANDRO BALLESTEROS, Matthew Sieber and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Rhyme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61481
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv51120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv49951
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv20817
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. Pinnacle Athletic Campus, LLC et al
as 6:2019cv06795
Defendant:
Sharon Cardarelli, Pinnacle Athletic Campus, LLC, Daniel Bree and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Boyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Marion County Sheriff, et al v. Michael Driver, et al
as 19-8021
Respondent:
MICHAEL BOYD, NICHOLAS SWORDS, ROY SHOFNER and others
Petitioner:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY
BOYD v. WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES et al
as 1:2018cv03352
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, MICHAEL OSBORN and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
