Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Mike Alexander Company, Inc. v. Refractory Depot, Inc.
as 4:2010mc00466
Plaintiff:
Mike Alexander Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Refractory Depot, Inc.
MIKE ALEXANDER COMPANY, INC. v. REFRACTORY DEPOT, INC.
as 2:2010mc00193
Plaintiff:
MIKE ALEXANDER COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
REFRACTORY DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
MIKE ALEXANDER COMPAMY, INC. v. REFRACTORY DEPOT, INC. et al
as 2:2010mc00305
Plaintiff:
MIKE ALEXANDER COMPAMY, INC.
Defendant:
REFRACTORY DEPOT, INC. and TUV SUD INDUSTRY SERVICE, INC.
Mike Alexander Company, Inc. v. Refractory Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2010mc10344
Plaintiff:
Mike Alexander Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Refractory Depot, Inc. and TUV SUD Industry Service, Inc.
Retherford v. Williams et al
as 3:2010cv00517
Respondent:
Captain Mike Alexander, Aaron Fehon, Deputy Johnson & Deputies et al and others
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Retherford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Solis v. 1st National Leasing, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00764
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
1st National Leasing, Inc., Robert Wilske and Mike Alexander
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Mike Alexander Company, Inc. v. Refractory Depot, Inc.
as 4:2009cv00435
Plaintiff:
Mike Alexander Company, Inc. and Mike Alexander Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Refractory Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McGee v. Roberts et al
as 6:2008cv01434
Petitioner:
Waye P. McGee
Respondent:
Craig Roberts and Mike Alexander
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
