Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Coggins v. Morgan and Morgan Law Firm
as 1:2020cv02870
Defendant:
Morgan and Morgan Law Firm
Plaintiff:
Jerome I. Coggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02463
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
KHAN et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2020cv00873
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FINE, SUCH, KAHN & SHEPARD, P.C. and JANE AND JOHN DOE, 1 THRU 20
Plaintiff:
MAHAMED KHAN and AZMA KHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KHAN et al v. PICCINI LLP et al
as 2:2020cv00200
Defendant:
JANE DOE, EVA K. CAREY, JP MORGAN CHASE MORGAN NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
MAHAMED KHAN and AZMA A KHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Horton et al
as 3:2018cv00600
Defendant:
Theophilus Horton, Enforcement Agency, Morgan and Morgan, PLLC and others
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
CARTAGENA v. MORGAN AND MORGAN, P.C. d/b/a MORGAN BORNSTEIN & MORGAN
as 1:2016cv09318
Plaintiff:
BOBBY CARTAGENA
Defendant:
MORGAN AND MORGAN, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HAILE et al v. HOUGHSTEIN et al
as 4:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
J JAY SANDERS HAILE, VII and R JENKINS
Defendant:
J JONES, P J BONDI, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caires v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv04579
Plaintiff:
Richard Caires
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal National Mortgage Association and JP Morgan Chase Morgan Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
