Cases 11 - 20 of 157
Tarlecky v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Karen Tarlecky
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Daro v. Embark Technology, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03246
Plaintiff:
Andy Daro
Defendant:
Embark Technology, Inc., Elaine Chao, Patricia Chiodo and others
Isaac v. Precythe et al
as 4:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Harold D. Isaac
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Teri Vandergriff, Jennifer Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Moak v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10659
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS MOAK
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Moak v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
GREGORY MOAK
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE Van McDaniel, OFFICER ARNOLD STEVENS, OFFICER TED ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abel et al v. Willis of Colorado Inc et al
as 3:2016cv02601
Plaintiff:
Abel, Stanford Kauffman, Bradley J Davis and others
Defendant:
Willis of Colorado Inc, Willis Ltd and WGH Holdings Ltd
Interested Party:
Ralph S Janvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Manning v. Embark Technology Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07526
Plaintiff:
Mr Robert Manning, II and Robert Manning, II
Defendant:
Embark Technology Inc., Ian Robertson, Ken Manget and others
Tron v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv08634
Plaintiff:
Sergio Tron
Defendant:
Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues and others
Luberisse v. Robertson et al
as 3:2022cv05455
Plaintiff:
Josh Luberisse and Northern Genesis Acquisition Corp. II
Defendant:
Ian Robertson, Ken Manget, Alex Rodrigues and others
(PC) Ashker v. Beard, et al.
as 1:2021cv00423
Defendant:
Hammer, Stebbins, Speidel and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
