Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Maldonado v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Maldonado
Defendant:
Pima, County of, Chris Nanos, Aimee Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Axos Bank v. Nano Banc et al
as 5:2019cv02092
Defendant:
Nano Banc, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Robert Hasler and others
Plaintiff:
Axos Bank
Lara-Sanchez v. Garland
as 23-996
Petitioner:
NANO LARA-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Nano-X Imaging Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv08611
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Nano-X Imaging Ltd. and Ran Poliakine
Nano Dimension Ltd. v. Murchinson Ltd.
as 23-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nano Dimension Ltd.
Defendant / Appellee:
Murchinson Ltd., EOM Management LTD, Nomis Bay Ltd. and others
CPAVC, Inc. v. Sancus-Trinity Nano Holdings, LLC
as 1:2023cv07742
Plaintiff:
CPAVC, Inc. and CPAV, INC.
Defendant:
SANCUS-TRINITY NANO HOLDINGS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
James Fraser v. Pennsylvania State University, et al
as 23-2413
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES FRASER
Defendant / Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, a Pennsylvania educational institution, ROBERT PAULSON, an individual, in his official and individual capacities, MELISSA ROLLS, an individual, in her official and individual capacities and others
Franklin v. Nanos et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Terrence Franklin
Defendant:
Chris Nanos and NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NANO FIRE LLC v. HALMA PLC et al
as 2:2023cv03562
Plaintiff:
Nano Fire LLC
Defendant:
Halma plc, Halma Holdings Inc., FirePro Systems Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Enabnit v. Nanos
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Eugene Enabnit
Defendant:
Chris Nanos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
