Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2021cv03964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Davis v. Banana Republic, LLC
as 1:2021cv06160
Plaintiff:
Nicole Davis
Defendant:
Banana Republic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
D'Agostino v. Arizona Department of Economic Security et al
as 2:2021cv01292
Plaintiff:
Daniel D D'Agostino and Daniel M D'Agostino
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Economic Security, Michael Wisehart, Nicole Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14781
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
DAVIS v. MED-STAR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
as 1:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
ALICIA NICOLE DAVIS
Defendant:
MED-STAR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Davis et al v. City Of Cincinnati et al
as 1:2021cv00080
Defendant:
Weston Voss, City Of Cincinnati and Emily Heine
Plaintiff:
Nicole Davis and Brandon Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv09573
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DAVIS and CHARLOTTE BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bamberg v. The Results Companies, LLC
as 0:2020cv61420
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bamberg, Shandellah Martin, Amanda Mesot and others
Defendant:
The Results Companies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davis v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03421
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nicole Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
