Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Blakney v. Williamson et al
as 4:2018cv03067
Defendant:
Officer Williamson and Officer Stokes
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. Officer Stokes et al
as 3:2018cv01195
Defendant:
Duval County Jail and Officer Stokes
Plaintiff:
Toby Stafford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Hooks
as 5:2018ct03076
Plaintiff:
Ricky Banks
Defendant:
Erik A. Hooks, Kenneth E. Lassiter, Thomas E. Asbell, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tashawn Thorne v. Officer Wesley
as 17-7039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASHAWN QWANTREAL THORNE
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER WESLEY, Piedmont Correctional Officer, OFFICER SHERWIN, Piedmont Regional Jail, OFFICER BOOKER, Piedmont Regional Jail Officer and others
Defendant:
MS. BOWEN, Mental Health, MS. L. SMITH, Medical Nurse, MRS. SERGEANT TISDALE, Grievance Coordinator and others
Thorne v. Sherwin et al
as 1:2016cv00967
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Defendant:
Officer Sherwin, Officer Wesley, Officer Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. Sherwin et al
as 5:2016ct03181
Plaintiff:
Tashawn Qwantreal Thorne
Defendant:
Officer Sherwin, Officer Wesley, Officer Booker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Stokes
as 1:2016cv05744
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Quinn
Defendant:
Officer Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riggins v. Chicago Heights et al
as 1:2014cv10160
Plaintiff:
Bryant Riggins
Defendant:
City of Chicago Heights , Officer Stokes and Officer Riegler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loretero et al v. City of Henderson State of Nevada et al
as 2:2012cv01176
Defendant:
City of Henderson State of Nevada, County of Clark, Yulaunda Greenberry and others
Plaintiff:
Branden Loretero and Harold Loretero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phillips v. Stokes et al
as 1:2011cv04364
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Phillips
Defendant:
Officer Stokes and Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
