Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Reyes v. City of Austin, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Julian Reyes
Defendant:
City of Austin, Inc., Austin Police Department, Troy Wismar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Cutchin et al v. Howard et al
as 1:2021cv03162
Plaintiff:
Robert Pena, Keith Rhames, Jerome Jamison and others
Defendant:
Charles W. Howard, Call-A-Head Portable Toilets, Inc. and Call-A-Head Corp.
Not Classified By Court:
Ira Cure
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Walsh et al v. Chubb et al
as 4:2020cv00510
Defendant:
Jonathan Beauchamp, Chubb, Pacific Indemnity Company and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Walsh and Alexandra Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Anderson et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2020cv00354
Plaintiff:
Armond Rhian Cox, Eileen Shipsey, Ashley Nicole Rodenheiser and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Walsh v. City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv10068
Respondent:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Warden (Acting) James Petrucci and Acting Warden James Petrucci
Petitioner:
Patrick Colby Walsh and Patrick Walsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Javado Thompson v. Freddy Johnson, et al
as 19-13346
Defendant / Appellee:
FREDDY JOHNSON and PATRICK WALSH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAVADO AUDRIC THOMPSON
WALSH v. STATE FARM FIRE INSURANCE CO.
as 2:2019cv03235
Plaintiff:
PATRICK WALSH
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walsh v. Coleman et al
as 3:2019cv00980
Defendant:
William Mulligan, Rollin Cook, Colleen Gallagher and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
