Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Wood v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03503
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Phillip Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip Wood v. Elizabeth Hogan, et al
as 18-3798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIZABETH HOGAN
WOOD v. USA
as 3:2018cv00003
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
PHILLIP WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DOTSON et al v. TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF et al
as 3:2016cv05233
Plaintiff:
JAMAL A. DOTSON, THOMAS F. KENNEDY, ALEX R. LOSCALZO and others
Defendant:
TRENTON PYS. HOSPITAL'S STAFF, ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER'S STAFF, S. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2015cv03186
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Phillip Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillip Wood v. Elizabeth Hogan, et al
as 14-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HOGAN, JENNA CACCESE, RICCARDO GRIPPALDI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DARIUS CHACINSKI
Woods v. Kram Tire International, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00074
Plaintiff:
Phillip Woods
Defendant:
Kram Tire International, Inc. and Sammy Foster
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Wood v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 6:2013cv01402
Plaintiff:
Phillip Wood
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
WOOD v. HOGAN et al
as 3:2013cv02453
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP WOOD
Defendant:
ELIZABETH HOGAN, DARIUS CHACINSKI, JENNA CACCESE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
