Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 60
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, et al v. Gregory W. Abbott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00844
Plaintiff: La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, The Anti-Defamation League Austin, Southwest, and Texoma and others
Consolidated Defendant: Isabel Longoria, Jacque Callanen, Yvonne Ramon and others
Defendant: Jose A. Esparza, Lupe C. Torres, Gregory W. Abbott and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Houston Justice, Houston Area Urban League, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Dana DeBeauvoir
Amicus Curiae: Foundation for Government Accountability, John R. Ashcroft, Young Black Lawyers' Organizing Coalition and others
Petitioner: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Harris County Republican Party, Dallas County Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Bellows We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1361
Plaintiff / Appellee: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION INC
Defendant / Appellant: SHENNA BELLOWS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of State for the State of Maine
Amicus Curiae: ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER
Type: Civil Rights Voting
In re: Public Interest Legal Foundation
as 1:2023mc00060
Petitioner: Electronic Registration Information Center, Inc and Electronic Registration Information Center, Inc.
Respondent: Public Interest Legal Foundation
In re: Public Interest Legal Foundation
as 1:2023mc00230
Petitioner: Electronic Registration Information Center, Inc
Respondent: Public Interest Legal Foundation
League of Women Voters of the United States, et al v. Steven Frid, et al
as 23-5058
Plaintiff / Appellee: League of Women Voters of the United States, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Georgia and others
Defendant / Appellee: Steven Frid, in his capacity as the Executive Director of the United States Election Assistance Commission and United States Election Assistance Commission
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. and Scott Schwab, Kansas Secretary of State
Intervenor: Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund
The Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Secretary Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1590
Plaintiff / Appellee: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellant: SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and JONATHAN M. MARKS, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretaryfor Elections and Commissions
Defendant: BUREAU OF COMMISSIONS ELECTIONS & LEGISLATION
The Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Secretary Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-1591
Plaintiff / Appellant: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Defendant / Appellee: SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and JONATHAN M. MARKS, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretaryfor Elections and Commissions
Defendant: BUREAU OF COMMISSIONS ELECTIONS & LEGISLATION
Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc. v. Toulouse Oliver
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Inc.
Defendant: Maggie Toulouse Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Boe et al v. Marshall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff: Paul A. Eknes-Tucker, Brianna Boe, James Zoe and others
Defendant: Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Daryl D. Bailey and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: State of Arkansas, State of West Virginia, State of Indiana and others
Petitioner: Eagle Forum of Alabama and Southeast Law Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Public Interest Legal Foundation v. Benson
as 1:2021cv00929
Plaintiff: Public Interest Legal Foundation
Defendant: Jocelyn Benson
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: APRI, Michigan Alliance of Retired Americans and Rise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?