Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Velasquez v. State of Utah, et al
as 20-4087
Defendant / Appellee:
J. STEPHEN MIKITA, Asst. Atty. Gnrl. APS, THOMAS R. VAUGHN, Atty of Gnrl Cnsl, UTAH OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS VELASQUEZ
Velasquez v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2020cv00205
Plaintiff:
Carlos Velasquez
Defendant:
State of Utah, Utah Division of Aging and Adult Services/APS, Utah Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28200
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN and DAMION R VAUGHN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stinchfield v. Virgin Islands Estates #60 Villa Association et.al
as 3:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Barry Duncan, Dennis R. Vaughn, DEBRA HADE and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stinchfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tommy Vaughn v. Andrew Saul
as 19-2838
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrew Saul, Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tommy R. Vaughn
Douglas Vaughn v. Correct Care Solutions
as 19-7280
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, Medical Staff / Nurses, NURSE CHELTON, Intake Nurse, NURSE ALVIN, Intake Nurse and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS R. VAUGHN
Douglas Vaughn v. Pidea
as 19-7020
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUPTY DENTON and DEPUTY PIDEA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS R. VAUGHN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Vaughn v. Pidea et al
as 1:2019cv00564
Defendant:
Deputy Denton and Deputy Pidea
Plaintiff:
Douglas R Vaughn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
