Cases 11 - 20 of 103
Abell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Tiarra Abell, Amelita Armendarez, Thomas Ash and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aguilar et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00774
Plaintiff:
Keli Aguilar, Gina Armendariz, Mariah Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Aguilar et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00774
Plaintiff:
Aguilar, Keli Aguilar, Gina Armendariz and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Russo et al v. Eastwood Construction Partners, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01686
Plaintiff:
Mary Russo, Karen Halverson, Samuel Halverson and others
Defendant:
Eastwood Construction Partners, LLC, Eastwood Homes, Inc., Exterior Contract Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-7069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cantero v. Kindred et al
as 5:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
King James Cantero
Defendant:
Daniel J. Kindred and Randy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2021cv03157
Plaintiff:
Ronda Brown and Randy Brown
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51520
Plaintiff:
RANDY BROWN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riggs v. Brown et al
as 5:2021cv00767
Plaintiff:
John Karey Riggs
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Unknown Deputy #1, Unknown Deputy #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spangler v. Speaks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Marcus Montez Spangler
Defendant:
Keller Speaks, Randy Brown, Phyllis Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
