Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Arthur v. Brown et al
as 5:2013cv01097
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Arthur
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Mathew Cate, R. T. C. Grounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 4:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, L. Trexler, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Citigold Auctions of South Florida, Inc. et al
as 9:2013cv80027
Plaintiff:
Richard Mack Burns
Defendant:
Citigold Auctions of South Florida, Inc., Citigold Auctions, Inc., Citigold Investments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Richard Mack v. Southern Poverty Law Center
as 12-50873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER
Treadway v. Malo-Clines et al
as 3:2012cv04039
Plaintiff:
John L. Treadway
Defendant:
Cheryl Malo-Clines, Edgar Clark, J. Boadoc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyshon Harmon v. Richard Mack, et al
as 12-15780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYSHON MAIEKE HARMON
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD MACK, Doctor, Salinas Valley State Prison, DONALD C. POMPAN, SAM PAJONG-DO, Salinas Valley State Prison and others
Mack v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2012cv10300
Plaintiff:
Richard Mack
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Mia Nikolich and R Nill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Nelson et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Defendant:
Heidi Beirich, Larry Keller, Leah Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Harmon v. Mack et al
as 5:2010cv04053
Plaintiff:
Tyshon Maleke Harmon
Defendant:
Richard Mack, Robert Bowman, R. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
