Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 742
USA v. Robert Walters
as 24-5054
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT ALLEN WALTERS
Austin v. McHugh et al
as 2:2023cv14370
Plaintiff: Robert Allen Austin
Defendant: Elizabeth Rose McHugh and James Walter McCann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff: Robert Allen
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv06107
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3084
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Robert Tribble, Jr. v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13696
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT ALLEN TRIBBLE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
McMaster, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01247
Plaintiff: Robert Allen McMaster, III
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DEWBREW, JR. v. KINCAID, II, et al
as 2:2023cv00468
Plaintiff: Mr. Herbert A Dewbrew and HERBERT A. DEWBREW, JR.
Defendant: ROBERT ALLEN KINCAID, Josh Gewirtzman, Jeremy Rasico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
J.C. v. Zimmerman
as 23-7492
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT ALLEN ZIMMERMAN and Bob Dylan
Plaintiff: J. C.
Appellant: PETER J. GLEASON
Respondent: DANIEL W. ISAACS
Davis v. Walker, et al.
as 23-2895
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNARD LEE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES WALKER, SAMUEL MCALPINE, CHERYL BAKEWELL and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?