Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Bell v. USA
as 5:2017cv00253
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
RONALD BELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HE et al v. YAHOO! INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00635
Defendant:
YAHOO! INC. , MICHAEL CALLAHAN , RONALD BELL and others
Plaintiff:
DEPU HE , ZILI YANG , DAWEI LI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ronald Bell
as 17-11490
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD BELL
Mandamus Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Tunstall-Bey v. Smith et al
as 5:2015ct03334
Plaintiff:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall-Bey
Defendant:
Paula Yvonne Smith, Carmen Hendricks, Letitia Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELL et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv06006
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE BELL and RONALD BELL
Defendant:
ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC., ZIMMER, INC., ZIMMER US, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Ronald Bell
as 15-12844
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD BELL
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
True the Vote, Inc. v. IRS, et al
as 14-5316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
True the Vote, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Internal Revenue Service, United States of America, Steven L. Miller, In his official and Individual capacity as former Deputy Commissioner, Services & Enforcement, and Acting Commissioner, Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-7165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
TRUE THE VOTE, INC. v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
TRUE THE VOTE, INC.
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEVEN T. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428 IRS: Declaratory Judgment
Bell v. Davis et al
as 2:2013cv02158
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bell
Defendant:
Franco Davis and Safeco Insurance Company of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
