Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Ronald Sutherland, Jr. v. John Sapper
as 22-7163
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD KEITH SUTHERLAND, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN SAPPER, ASHLEY HUGHES, JASON W. COHOON and others
Watkins v. OPM
as 22-2085
Petitioner:
RONALD KEITH WATKINS
Respondent:
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Davis et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01294
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Davis and Shirley Davis
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sutherland v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02088
Petitioner:
Ronald Keith Sutherland, Jr.
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Turrentine v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 21-12772
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD KEITH TURRENTINE
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER
Kennedy III v. Jones III
as 0:2021cv01097
Defendant:
Deputy Jones III
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Kennedy III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Dorney et al
as 2:2021cv02043
Defendant:
Jackson Ryan, Jail Administrator Jimmy Dorney, Justin Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams, Ronald v. Fuchs, Larry
as 3:2020cv01105
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Petitioner:
Rondald Keith Williams and Ronald Keith Williams
Respondent:
Larry Fuchs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sutherland v. Sapper et al
as 5:2020ct03322
Defendant:
John Sapper, Jason W. Cohoon, Ashley Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Sutherland, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turrentine v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 4:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Ronald Keith Turrentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
