Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Moore v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
David Lee Moore
Defendant:
Ricky S. Dixon, Warden Lane, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flaherty v. Dixon et al
as 1:2022cv02642
Plaintiff:
Marie Flaherty
Defendant:
Lindsey S. Dixon and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
United States v. Jeffrey Dixon
as 22-1267
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeffrey S. Dixon
Hung Dang v. Kimberly Moore, et al
as 21-36040
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNG DANG
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY MOORE, M.D., MARK ADAMS, M.D., Former Chief Medical Officer for FHS, KETUL PATEL, Chief Executive Officer for FHS and others
Defendant:
MARK JOHNSON, MQAC member, WILLIAM M. BRUEGGEMANN, MQAC member, RICK J. GLEIN, MQAC staff attorney and others
DIXSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02673
Plaintiff:
SHANAE S. DIXON and SHENAE S. DIXSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dang v. Moore et al
as 3:2020cv06178
Defendant:
Marlin Appelwick, Rick J Glein, Franciscan Health System and others
Plaintiff:
Hung Dang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv02912
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LIMITED, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
TWANA S. DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv02876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Hall v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00215
Defendant:
Mgr., Food Service Joanna D McGowen, Dir., Food Service Leanard Echessa, Mgr., Food Service Nina S Dixon and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred L Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
