Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Moler v. USA et al
as 2:2020cv00981
Defendant:
J Mayeaux, Ian Connors, Kedric Gasaway and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. USA et al
as 2:2020cv00876
Defendant:
J Mayeaux, Ian Connors, Kedric Gasaway and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv01908
Defendant:
K. Richard, J. Mayeaux, Kedric Gasaway and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powers v. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC
as 1:2019cv01241
Defendant:
Rosenberg & Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Powers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Moler v. Baty et al
as 2:2019cv00809
Defendant:
Ms Brown, Tecora Ballom, T Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Raven Transport Co. Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10875
Plaintiff:
Terrell Christopher Gardner
Defendant:
Raven Transport Co. Inc. and Jeffrey S. Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powers v. Cooper
as 1:2018cv01172
Plaintiff:
Gregory S. Powers
Defendant:
Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
POWER et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv12805
Plaintiff:
LINDA S. POWER and GARY L. POWER
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group et al v. Shreve et al
as 5:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group , Sandeep Badwalsigh and Indy Freight, Inc.
Defendant:
Randall Ryan Shreve , Kasee Renee Porter, Gerry W. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
