Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Parnell v. USA et al
as 2:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Anthony Parnell
Defendant:
USA, S Futrell, Melissa Loveday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florez v. Judd et al
as 1:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Florez
Defendant:
Betty Judd, S. Woodard, FNU Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv02262
Petitioner:
Aric S. Woodard
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel, Robert Gilmore, Mark Garman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BRYANT v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
GENERAL ARNEZ BRYANT, III
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, ALAN GRINER, C DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solazzo v. Tenbrink, et al
as 12-1288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW VITO SOLAZZO
Defendant - Appellee:
CORY B. TENBRINK, to be sued in his individual capacity, JULIE MARSHALL, to be sued in her individual capacity, NANCY L. COHEN, to be sued in her individual capacity and others
Conseco Life Insurance Company v. Ruth T Banks et al
as 2:2012cv04224
Defendant:
Ruth T Banks, Jimmie L Wilson and Gregory S Woodard
Plaintiff:
Conseco Life Insurance Company
Solazzo v. Tenbrink et al
as 1:2012cv00649
Defendant:
Cory B. Tenbrink, Julie Marshall, Nancy L. Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew V. Solazzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv01055
Plaintiff:
Nancy S. Woodard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tommy Fryman v. W Duncan, et al
as 10-15371
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY LEE FRYMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
W A DUNCAN, Warden and JEANNE S. WOODARD, Director, California Department of Corrections
Woodard v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2009cv21022
Plaintiff:
Antoinette S. Woodard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
