Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Banks v. CCA Corporate Office et al
as 1:2013cv02797
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
CCA Corporate Office, Michael Pugh, CCA NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-3116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, Charles Samuels, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Frederick Banks v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-2995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, an American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 1:2013cv02065
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 1:2013cv01751
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Ten Unknown Named SHU Correctional Officers of FCC Forest City, Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis Davidson v. M. Bragg, et al
as 13-50004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS LEON DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
M. TRAVIS BRAGG, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution - La Tuna, A. W. SHACKS, Assistant Warden, Federal CorrectionaI Institution - La Tuna, CAPTAIN LYONS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Banks et al v. Sutierland et al
as 1:2011cv01551
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Damion Black
Defendant:
AW Sutierland, Donahue, Donna Zicketoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Dennis Roger Van Dyke et al v. A Diaz et al
as 2:2010cv09740
Defendant:
Bowers, Bowers, Harley Cappin and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
