Cases 11 - 20 of 213
Tod Seelie v. Dieline Media LLC
as 2:2023cv02159
Plaintiff:
Tod Seelie
Defendant:
Dieline Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Moore v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Alberto Ramirez, Timothy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dragoo et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv12780
Plaintiff:
Walter Dragoo and Penni Seely
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward v. Seely et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Norel Sterling Ward
Defendant:
Ms. Seely and Ms. Cabell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seely v. Eastern Region #9 et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
John Seely
Defendant:
Eastern Region #9, WMNF US Forest Service and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Boyd v. Larregui et al
as 3:2022cv01592
Plaintiff:
Reggie Boyd
Defendant:
Larregui, Captain Torres, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Seely v. zow.com
as 1:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Marci Seely
Defendant:
zow.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
John Seely v. James Seely, et al
as 22-2651
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SEELY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES SEELY, PHILLIP E. HOUK and GREGORY PACHMAYR
John Seely v. James Seely, et al
as 22-2562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN SEELY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES SEELY, PHILLIP E. HOUK, GREGORY PACHMAYR and others
John Seely v. Holly A. Brady
as 22-2553
Petitioner:
JOHN SEELY
Respondent:
HOLLY A. BRADY
Interested Party:
JAMES SEELY, PHILLIP E. HOUK, Allen County Magistrate Judge, GREGORY PACHMAYR, Clerk of the Indiana Court of Appeals and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
