Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ramos v. Goshen County Detention Center Corporal et al
as 2:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Goshen County Detention Center Lieutenant, Goshen County Detention Center Sergeant Klingsporn, Goshen County Detention Center Sergeant Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dean Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Durwyn Talley v. Lieutenant Meister, et al
as 19-3032
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY ESKINS, SERGEANT MILLER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER QUINN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DURWYN TALLEY
Dixon v. Rederick et al
as 8:2018cv03448
Defendant:
A.R.P. Coordinator S. Beeman, CO II Wilma Parfield, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
William K. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Kravitz v. City of Hudson et al
as 1:2017cv01175
Defendant:
Detective Sergeant Miller, Unknown Employees and Agents of City of Hudson, Officer Craig Haigh and others
Plaintiff:
Jay S. Kravitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jamar Wilson v. Byanahak Jin, et al
as 17-1593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMAR WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BYANAHAK JIN, MIA HI PARK, SERGEANT MILLER and others
Christopher Scruggs v. Sergeant Miller
as 16-3552
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT MILLER
Christopher Scruggs v. Sergeant Miller, et al
as 16-3427
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER L. SCRUGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT MILLER, LIEUTENANT CREASY, G. PAYNE and others
Duren v. Adams et al
as 4:2016cv04074
Plaintiff:
William Brandon Duren
Defendant:
Golden Adams , Sergeant Miller and Corporal Griffen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jensen v. Brendel et al
as 3:2016cv00407
Defendant:
Adam Brendel, James Buchanan, Timothy Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Hansley et al
as 4:2016cv04055
Plaintiff:
Alexius M. Hill
Defendant:
Officer Hansley, Lieutenant Adams, Sergeant Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
