Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00580
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Stapleton v. Warden Birkholz et al
as 2:2026cv07390
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Defendant:
Warden Birkholz and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wood v. Stapleton
as 1:2026cv04652
Plaintiff:
Dexter Wood
Defendant:
Captain Jackson D. Stapleton, John Doe NYPD Officers 1-3 and Julieann D. Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Stapleton v. Birkholz et al
as 2:2026cv06284
Plaintiff:
Michael Stapleton
Defendant:
Warden Birkholz, John Doe Clinical Director and John Doe Health Service Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00416
Petitioner:
David Meyers
Respondent:
A. Duncan, D. Anderson, M. Pozeg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valenti v. Stapleton et al
as 5:2026cv00162
Plaintiff:
Anthony Valenti
Defendant:
Peter Stapleton and Blackridge Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 26-1999
Applicant:
FRANSHON STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 26-1995
Petitioner:
FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Burgess v. Dotson et al
as 7:2026cv00368
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Joseph Walters, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
