Cases 1 - 10 of 1,005
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 24-1563
Petitioner:
FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stapleton v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Ashley Stapleton
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Levac v. Haney et al
as 6:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Sarah Haney, Sheriff Travis Hill, Sheriff Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franshon Stapleton v. USA
as 24-1501
Petitioner:
FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dawson et al v. Mountain Creek Family Resort and Canoe Rental LLC
as 6:2024cv03085
Plaintiff:
Mohogany Dawson and Taye Stapleton
Defendant:
Mountain Creek Family Resort and Canoe Rental LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Levac v. Haney et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Daniel Levac
Defendant:
Sarah Haney, Travis Hill, Garrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Stapleton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 24-1412
Plaintiff:
KELLY STAPLETON
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
United States v. Michael Stapleton
as 24-1557
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Lee Gene Stapleton
Stapleton v. Lozano
as 24-40155
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Louise Stapleton and Dawn Stapleton, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joshua Stapleton
Defendant:
Ernesto Lozano, Justin Lee Becerra and Cesar Solis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
