Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Jesse Stephen King v. Patrick Eaton
as 5:2022cv00861
Plaintiff:
Jesse Stephen King
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
R.G. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
R. G., RANDA MUDARRIS, ROBERT GROSHON III and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
King v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv60802
Plaintiff:
Stephen King
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
C. et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2021cv02992
Plaintiff:
H. C., Ryan Craig, Lynette Craig and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia and District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv47517
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23974
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Newmar Corporation
as 3:2021cv00206
Defendant:
Newmar Corporation
Plaintiff:
Stephen King and Christina King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Dappcentral, Inc. et al v. Guagliardo et al
as 1:2021cv00809
Plaintiff:
Dappcentral, Inc., Rex Technologies, GmbH and Stephen King
Defendant:
Mark Guagliardo and United States Real Estate Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t
Choate v. Runion et al
as 4:2020cv04109
Defendant:
Captain Golden Adams, Sheriff Jackie Runion, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Plaintiff:
William Clayton Choate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
