Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Office of the Attorney General et al v. Berger Law Group, P.A. et al
as 8:2014cv01825
Plaintiff:
Office of the Attorney General and State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Berger Law Group, P.A., Ian Berger, Litigation Law, LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark J. Bernet
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 0022
O'Neil et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26794
Plaintiff:
Katheryn O'Neil and Stephen Randall
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'NEIL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as NJ/3:13-cv-04280
Plaintiff:
KATHERYN O'NEIL and STEPHEN RANDALL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , ETHICON, INC. and ETHICON, LLC
Ashley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2013cv51333
Plaintiff:
Stephen Randall Ashley
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-51333
Plaintiff:
Stephen Randall Ashley
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc , Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation , Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
O'NEIL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2013cv04280
Plaintiff:
KATHERYN O'NEIL and STEPHEN RANDALL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON, INC. and ETHICON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Stephen Luxford
as 13-60390
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
STEPHEN RANDALL LUXFORD
SMITH v. WARDEN MAIORANA et al
as 3:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN RANDALL SMITH
Defendant:
WARDEN MAIORANA, MR. WRIGHT, DR. FARKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In the Matter of Stephen Randall Harris - #064176
as 3:2012mc80226
Respondent:
Stephen Randall Harris
Smith v. USA
as 3:2012cv00045
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen Randall Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
