Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Karout v. McBridge et al
as 3:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Sammer Karout
Defendant:
David B. Sulkis , Susan Shaw , A. Dennis McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW et al v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2011vv00228
Petitioner:
SUSAN SHAW and S. S.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Adams et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03675
Plaintiff:
Lester Adams , Juanita M. Alexander , John A. Atwood and others
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc., North American Catastrophe Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Shaw et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Susan Shaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mackey et al v. Patriot Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07910
Defendant:
Patriot Homes, Inc., Insurco, Ltd., Bechtel National Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Felix Mackey, Felix Mackey, Felix Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shaw v. Woodmansee et al
as 2:2009cv03130
Plaintiff:
Susan Shaw
Defendant:
C W Woodmansee and J E Woodmansee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shaw v. Woodmansee et al
as 2:2009at01804
Plaintiff:
Susan Shaw
Defendant:
C W Woodmansee and J E Woodmansee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tani v. St. Mary's County et al
as 8:2008cv01950
Plaintiff:
Kess Tani
Defendant:
St. Mary's County, Francis J. Russell, Kenneth R. Dement and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHAW v. CAPITAL COLLECTION SERVICES
as 2:2008cv01836
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SHAW
Defendant:
CAPITAL COLLECTION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
