Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Michael Webb v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection
as 19-1988
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID WEBB, a/k/a Mike Webb
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Green v. U.S. Merit System Protection Board et al
as 1:2019cv05404
Defendant:
Jeff T.H. Pon, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, U.S. Merit System Protection Board Office of General Counsel and others
Plaintiff:
Natalie Green
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
GREEN v. U.S. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD et al
as 1:2019cv02454
Plaintiff:
NATALIE GREEN
Defendant:
U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, U.S. MERIT SYSTEM PROTECTION BOARD and JEFF T. H. PON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Webb v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection
as 19-1436
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID WEBB, a/k/a Mike Webb
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
Webb v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 1:2019cv00257
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Webb and Major Mike Webb
Defendant:
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ashe v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
as 8:2018cv00372
Plaintiff:
Keith Alexander Ashe
Defendant:
U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2013
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Franklin v. U.S Merit Systems Protection Board
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Robert D Franklin
Defendant:
U.S Merit Systems Protection Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Johnen v. U.S. Merit Systems Protection, et al
as 16-73427
Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. JOHNEN
Respondent:
U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
