Cases 11 - 20 of 111
Gent Row, LLC v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 24-10387
Plaintiff:
GENT ROW, LLC
Defendant:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Goodnough et al v. Truist Financial Corporation et al
as 5:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Taylor Goodnough and Kevin Kohl
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Yancey v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 1:2023cv01792
Plaintiff:
Bryan Yancey
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Toler v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 2:2023cv00788
Plaintiff:
Shawnda Toler
Defendant:
Truist Financial Corporation
Mawule Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 23-6098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Burch v. Truist Bank Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04960
Plaintiff:
Bradley K. Burch
Defendant:
Truist Bank Inc., Truist Financial Corporation and John Does I, II, III, IV, and V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
