Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00965
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Sultanate of Oman v. Al Tamimi
as 1:2018cv11291
Plaintiff:
The Sultanate of Oman
Defendant:
Adel A Hamadi Al Tamimi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bassem Al-Tamimi, et al v. Sheldon Adelson, et al
as 17-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Bassem Al-Tamimi, Susan Abulhawa, Doa'a Abu Amer and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheldon Adelson, Norman Braman, Lawrence Ellison and others
PELED et al v. NETANYAHU et al
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
MIKO PELED , SUSAN ABULHAWA , ALI ALI and others
Defendant:
BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, EHUD BARAK, AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1154
Sanders et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00628
Plaintiff:
Pierre Sanders , Everton Johnson , Darrell Cottman and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AL-TAMIMI et al v. ADELSON et al
as 1:2016cv00445
Defendant:
ADELSON, SHELDON ADELSON, NORMAN BRAMAN and others
Plaintiff:
AL-TAMIMI, BASSEM AL-TAMIMI, SUSAN ABULHAWA and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
MIRIAM ADELSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00613
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Butler v. Tamimi
as 0:2015cv00087
Defendant:
Tamimi and Essam Al Tamimi
Plaintiff:
Butler and Scott Franklin Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAMIMI v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2014cv04024
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD A. TAMIMI
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
