Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,432
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00217
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. U. S. Attorney General
as 22-6878
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee: U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Director
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Governor
as 22-6873
Plaintiff / Appellant: (CHIEF) MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee: GOVENOR, for the State of West Virginia and U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2579
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01610
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
David Meyers v. Chief U.S. District Judge
as 22-6604
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee: CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE, OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT GREENSBORO NC DIVISION, U. S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Wanda Allen v. Wake County Sheriff's Department
as 22-1490
Plaintiff / Appellant: WANDA M. ALLEN
Defendant / Appellee: WAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, Captian Byrd and U. S. ATTORNEY, G. Norman Acker, III
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Warden
as 22-6434
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, F.C.I. Beckley, W.Va., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. U. S. Attorney General
as 22-6391
Plaintiff / Appellant: (CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee: U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and DIRECTOR, F. BOP
Gerald Timms v. U. S. Attorney General
as 22-6338
Petitioner / Appellant: GERALD WAYNE TIMMS
Respondent / Appellee: U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?