Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carrillo v. United Parcel Service Company
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Melchor J Carrillo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CELESTE STEIN DESIGNS, INC. v. CATLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 4:2012cv03757
Plaintiff:
CELESTE STEIN DESIGNS, INC.
Defendant:
CATLIN INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., UPS CAPITAL CORPORATION d/b/a CAPITAL INSURANCE AGENCY, CAPITAL INSURANCE AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Walker v. United Parcel Service Co.
as 4:2012cv01053
Defendant:
UPSCO United Parcel Service Company
Plaintiff:
Andrew Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cahue et al v. United Parcel Service Company et al
as 6:2011cv00029
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Company , Steven Booker and Coby Cowan
Plaintiff:
Maria Cahue and Alma Palacios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koenig et al v. United Parcel Service Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jerome Koenig and Jeanette Koenig
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc, United Parcel Service of America, Inc., United Parcel Service Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Raymond Bernal v. United Parcel Service Company
as 10-55033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND BERNAL, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-17206
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
