Cases 11 - 20 of 32
RUDDICK v. STEVENS
as 3:2017cv00914
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE R RUDDICK
Defendant:
JOHN DOE STEVENS and UNNAMED CORRECTIONS OFFICER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Russell et al
as 3:2017cv01061
Plaintiff:
Leonard A Mack
Defendant:
N. R. Russell and Six (6) Unnamed Corrections Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irizarry v. Ring et al
as 2:2017cv00744
Plaintiff:
Jose Irizarry
Defendant:
Ring, Wyosocky and Unnamed Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2016cv02030
Plaintiff:
Lawrence A. Taylor
Defendant:
David Ebbert, Heath, Napp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Randal Mauderer v. Iowa Department of Corrections, et al
as 16-3129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randal Mauderer
Defendant - Appellee:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Anamosa State Penitentiary, Lieutenant Mills, Correctional Officer and others
Mauderer v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Randal Mauderer
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Anamosa State Penitentiary, Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Palmer et al
as 3:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Enoch Donnell Hall
Defendant:
John Palmer, Jeffery McClellan, Gina Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
North v. Cuyahoga County, et al
as 1:2015cv01124
Plaintiff:
Cameron North
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County , John Doe, Unnamed Correctional Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCray v. State of New York et al
as 1:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
Cerious D. McCray and Lydia R. McCray
Defendant:
State of New York, County of Chemung, Catherine K. Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00116
Petitioner:
Danielle M White
Respondent:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Corrections Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
