Cases 11 - 20 of 539
Jones v. Via Path Communication et al
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Via Path Communication, CDCR Office of Grievances, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cavazos v. Grajeda et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Defendant:
E. Grajeda, F. Trevino, Via De Luz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Via, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6015
Plaintiff:
ROBERT KING VIA, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, K. CROSBY, Regional Ombudsman for VDOC, BETH CABELL, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
Broadhead v. VIA Health Center
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Julia Broadhead
Defendant:
VIA Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Wright v. Ascension Via Christi St. Joseph
as 6:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Josie T. Wright
Defendant:
Ascension Via Christi St. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Burrow v. Unknown et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Estrellita Burrow
Defendant:
Unknown and VIA Transit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
TOMBLIN v. DEL TORO et al
as 1:2023cv03782
Plaintiff:
NICKY S TOMBLIN and NICKY S. TOMBLIN
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO and REAR ADMIRAL DARIN K. VIA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Clark v. Via Renewables, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00568
Plaintiff:
Brian Clark
Defendant:
VIA RENEWABLES, INC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sierra v. Covello et al
as 9:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Francisco Sierra
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, E. Baskerville, M. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
