Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Michael Moore v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 19-41005
Respondent / Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL VINCENT MOORE
Blanchard v. Guirand et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02642
Defendant: Matthew N. Fandre, John Kent, United States of America, Department of the Army and others
Plaintiff: Katie A. Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Accardo et al v. Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11314
Plaintiff: Douglas E. Smith, Zulma Candelario, Norman Green and others
Defendant: Kingdon of Saudi Arabia
Petitioner: Darryl Adone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Antiterrorism & Effective Death Penalty Act 1996
Moore v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04038
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: Vincent Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Director, TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv00423
Petitioner: Michael Vincent Moore
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moore v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2017cv00337
Petitioner: Michael Vincent Moore
Respondent: Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MITCHELL v. FLINT et al
as 1:2016cv00373
Plaintiff: JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant: WILLIAM FLINT, VINCENT MOORE and JACOB SCHLUMPF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. MOORE et al
as 1:2016cv00254
Plaintiff: JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant: VINCENT MOORE, WILLIAM FLINT and JACOB SCHLUMPF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. MOORE et al
as 1:2015cv00915
Plaintiff: JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant: VINCENT MOORE, GREEN and HELMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. MOORE
as 1:2015cv00636
Plaintiff: JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant: VINCENT MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?