Cases 11 - 20 of 5,407
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01945
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HILSTER et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv01537
Defendant:
CRANE INSTRUMENTATION & SAMPLING, INC., FLOWSERVE CORPORATION, SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SYSTEMS USA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES W. HILSTER, JR. and SHIRLEY A. HILSTER
Counter Defendant:
GRINNELL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LITTLE et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03255
Defendant:
MALIK N. COPE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER CAMPBELL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES LITTLE and LETTIE LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPE v. MS. BRITTAIN et al
as 1:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Kimberly Barkley, Susan Wolfe and SUPERINTENDANT MS. Brittain
Plaintiff:
Jay B. Cope
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COPE v. MS. BRITTAIN et al
as 2:2020cv00225
Petitioner:
JAY B. COPE
Respondent:
KIMBERLY BARKLEY, SUPERINTENDANT MS. BRITTAIN and SUSAN WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. A. O. SMITH CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv05666
Defendant:
CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, TEXTRON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
ROGERS v. A.O. SMITH CORP et al
as 2:2019cv05544
Defendant:
TEXTRON, SELBY BATTERSBY AND COMPANY, GOODYEAR CANADA and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
COPES v. SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv03647
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Petitioner:
LEONARD COPES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brett v. (unreadable) et al
as 1:2019cv01161
Defendant:
Mike McGloal, Dermont Fishman, Robert Rochwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
