Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Thiel v. Grosse Pointe Farms, City of et al
as 2:2020cv10717
Defendant:
Grosse Pointe Farms, City of, Louis Theros and William Burgess
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thiel
Thiel v. Grosse Pointe Farms, City of et al
as 2:2020cv10411
Defendant:
Joseph Adams, Donald Wheaton, Matthew Rumora and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Thiel
Fulton v. It's Moving LLC et al
as 3:2020cv05135
Defendant:
It's Moving LLC, Marina Kiseleva, "Doe" Beeler and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Fulton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BURGESS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURGESS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JP Morgan Chase Manhattan Bank v. Larry Winget, et al
as 16-2130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE MANHATTAN BANK
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY J. WINGET and LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST
Defendant:
WILLIAM BURGESS and COMERCIA BANK
Burgess v. Sherrod et al
as 1:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
William Burgess
Defendant:
Brian Sherrod, Cody Bailey, Stan Hanney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Wharton v. Mike Kemna, et al
as 14-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Michael Wharton
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Kemna, Dr. Fredrick Covillo, William Burgess, Warden and others
Brenda Armstrong, et al v. Glaxosmithkline LLC
as 13-80196
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BRENDA ARMSTRONG, JOBY BAKER, LATONYA BANKS and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
WILLIAM BURGESS v. LHS PENSACOLA #5 INC et al
as 3:2013cv00406
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BURGESS
Defendant:
LHS PENSACOLA #5 INC , JAY PATEL and NARESH PATEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Armstrong v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03113
Plaintiff:
Brenda Armstrong , Joby Baker , Latonya Banks and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
