Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc., v. PNC BANK et al
as 4:2022cv04465
Plaintiff:
Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc.,
Garnishee:
PNC BANK and Woodforest National Bank
Rodriguez v. Remitly, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv02724
Plaintiff:
Jose F. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Remitly, Inc., Woodforest National Bank, Brandon Huerta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Woodforest National Bank v. Valeo Senior, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Woodforest National Bank
Defendant:
Valeo Senior, LLC, Valeo Groupe US, LLC and Michael W. Rollins
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dynapass IP Holdings LLC v. Woodforest National Bank et al
as 2:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Dynapass IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Woodforest National Bank and Woodforest Financial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Johnson v. New York State
as 22-456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
New York State, Division of Human Rights, David E. Powell, Kathy Hochul and others
Johnson v. New York State et al
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
New York State, David E. Powell, Kathy Hochul and others
USA v. 1.$19,280.67 SEIZED FROM WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT NO. 1964001299
as 1:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
1.$19,280.67 SEIZED FROM WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK ACCOUNT NO. 1964001299
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv04231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
DeAngelo v. Woodforest National Bank
as 4:2021cv02422
Plaintiff:
Alyssa DeAngelo
Defendant:
Woodforest National Bank, Unknown Heirs, if any, of Peter S. Larkin and Julie Ciolino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
