Cases 11 - 20 of 27,936
Clark et al v. Mangham et al
as 5:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Mr & Mrs Larry E Clark and L & M Hair Care Products Inc
Defendant:
Mangham Hardy Rolfs & Abadie, Terrence J Donahue, Sr, Charles McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Hampson v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04058
Plaintiff:
Walter Thomas Hampson
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armoni Johnson v. Walter Koehler, et al
as 24-2054
Plaintiff:
ARMONI MASUD JOHNSON
Defendant:
WALTER KOEHLER, CHRISTOPHER O'BRIEN, CHRISTOPHER LAMB and others
Fisk v. Lumpkin
as 24-50452
Petitioner:
Walter Fisk
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Weiss v. Spencer et al
as 1:2024cv00959
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Weiss
Defendant:
Walter Scott Spencer, Affordable Services Corp., AMERICAN WATER & MOLD RESTORATION CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Stochevski v. Weingarten et al
as 4:2024cv02096
Plaintiff:
Walter Stochevski
Defendant:
Tomer Weingarten, David Bernhardt, Charlene T. Begley and others
Ferguson v. Working
as 3:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Walter Ferguson
Defendant:
John Working
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley #230375 v. Hope College et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Walter Crawley #230375
Defendant:
Hope College, Richard Raymond, David Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Walter C Brooks
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
