Cases 11 - 20 of 158
Cook v. Moore et al
as 3:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Demond Cook
Defendant:
Hillar C. Moore and William Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Morris Sanders et al
as 4:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Holly Anderson
Defendant:
William Morris Sanders, III and Bill Sanders Moving, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10560
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MORRIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dixon v. Adams
as 23-799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shaw-Nae Dixon, Thomas Casatelli, Jeanette Rivera and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Adams and City of New York
William Morris v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01323
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
William Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Joseph Garrido v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Garrido
Defendant:
Joseph Williams, County of Los Angeles, Alex Villanueva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Dahlquist et al v. Morris et al
as 1:2022cv02162
Defendant:
William Morris, Rocky's Lake Estate, LLC, Cherokee County, Georgia and others
Plaintiff:
Christi Dahlquist and Kirk Dahlquist
Dixon et al v. DeBlasio et al
as 1:2021cv05090
Plaintiff:
Shaw-Nae Dixon, Thomas Casatelli, Jeanette Rivera and others
Defendant:
Bill DeBlasio and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
