Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Brown v. Bates County Missouri et al
as 4:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
William Newell Brown
Defendant:
Bates County Missouri and James K Journey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kent Terry, Sr., et al v. William Newell, et al
as 14-15284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENT TERRY, Sr. and JOSEPHINE TERRY, in their individual capacities as the parents of Brian A. Terry, deceased, and as pending applicants to be co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Brian A. Terry
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM NEWELL, JANE DOE NEWELL, GEORGE GILLETT and others
Newell v. Colvin
as 4:2013cv00842
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Newell
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Auto Owners Insurance Company v. Premier Restoration & Remodeling Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01530
Plaintiff:
Auto Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Premier Restoration & Remodeling Inc, Jerry Sulzby, William Newell Sheridan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. William Brockbrader
as 13-30093
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM NEWEL BROCKBRADER
Terry et al v. Newell et al
as 2:2012cv02659
Plaintiff:
Kent Terry, Sr. , Josephine Terry and Julie Epperson
Defendant:
William Newell, Unknown Newell, George Gillett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Newell v. Henderson et al
as 4:2012cv00122
Plaintiff:
William Newell
Defendant:
Angie Henderson and Unknown Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Markham et al v. Gulfstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jerry Markham , Gregory Marshall , Raven Mason and others
Defendant:
Gulfstream Coach, Inc., CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newell v. Edison Chouest Offshore, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Newell
Defendant:
Edison Chouest Offshore, LLC and Fictitious Defendants A through F
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
