Cases 11 - 20 of 27,278
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mitchell v. Stateville NRC
as 3:2024cv01276
Plaintiff:
Willis Mitchell
Defendant:
Stateville NRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. USA
as 1:2024cv00283
Petitioner:
George Willis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LOPEZ v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
MARTIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, CASEY JACOBS-CAMPBELL and MIKAYLA WILLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Negron v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03939
Plaintiff:
Willie Negron
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Robert Annabel, II v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, official and personal capacity, named as Heidi Washington, JEREMY BUSH, Deputy Director, official and personal capacity, ASSISTANT DEPUTY WARDEN MCKINNEY, official and personal capacity and others
Volynets v. Bradley County et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Roxana Volynets
Defendant:
Bradley County, City of Cleveland, Tennessee and Willie Espinoza, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3053
Petitioner:
KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party:
FAYE CHESS, ANN DAVIDSON, ADAM EISENBERG and others
Bentley v. National Grid
as 6:2024cv06300
Plaintiff:
Willie Bentley, Jr.
Defendant:
National Grid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
