Cases 11 - 20 of 863
Palmer, et al. v. Trevino, et al.
as 24-1602
Plaintiff:
SUSAN SOTO PALMER, ALBERTO MACIAS, FABIOLA LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
STEVEN HOBBS, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and STATE OF WASHINGTON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington
Intervenor:
JOSE A. TREVINO, ISMAEL F. CAMPOS and ALEX YBARRA
Phillip Maciel v. Riverside County Sheriffs Department et al
as 5:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Phillip Maciel
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriffs Department, Ybarra, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ybarra v. City Of Houston
as 4:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
James Ybarra
Defendant:
City Of Houston and Gerald Goines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
West-Ybarra v. Exactech Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Suzanne West-Ybarra
Defendant:
Exactech Inc., Exactech U.S. Inc., TPG, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ybarra v. Hinthorne
as 2:2024cv02037
Petitioner:
Abraham John Ybarra
Respondent:
Cherryle Hinthorne
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Yan v. State Bar of TX
as 24-10036
Plaintiff:
Conghua Yan
Defendant:
State Bar of Texas, a private company, Barrows Firm, a private company, Leslie Starr Barrows, in Individual Capacity, as Member of the State Bar of Texas and others
Ybarra v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00137
Petitioner:
Martin Ybarra
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
