Cases 211 - 220 of 831,808
Dougan, Don v. Buesgen, Chris et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Don A. R. Dougan
Defendant:
Chris S. Buesgen, J. Barker, Dr. Palop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office et al
as 1:2024cv00747
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility Program Office, S. Huss, A. Coudillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Janet Barr v. David Denmark, et al
as 24-12075
Plaintiff:
JANET BARR
Defendant:
DAVID DENMARK and NIRSO PIMENTAL
Appalachian Region Independent Power Producers Ass v. EPA, et al
as 24-1222
Petitioner:
Appalachian Region Independent Power Producers Association
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Bestman v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02863
Petitioner:
Sayon Bestman
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Johnny Thompson, Jr
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VISTE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00983
Petitioner:
ZENAIDA VISTE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MATEEN-PIERCE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00984
Petitioner:
HUETTA MATEEN-PIERCE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
US v. Jomar Ortiz-Lopez
as 24-6617
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOMAR ALBERTO ORTIZ-LOPEZ
Robert Ballard v. John Dozier
as 24-6621
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. BALLARD
Defendant:
JOHN J. DOZIER, BRITTNAY COLEMAN, PATRICIA HUNT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
