Cases 21 - 30 of 11,446
Jenkins v. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
as 5:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Scott Jenkins
Defendant:
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Durst v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00835
Plaintiff:
McClain Durst
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Uriah Melton, Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Perpinan, Alberto A. v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2024cv21769
Plaintiff:
Alberto Abdel Perpinan
Defendant:
Asharell Jenkins, J. Dominguez, Mantencon R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JENKINS v. RHODE ISLAND STATE et al
as 1:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
GARY V. JENKINS
Defendant:
RHODE ISLAND STATE, UPS STORE #7051, RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jenkins v. Gulf Intermodal
as 24-30297
Plaintiff:
Gerren Jenkins and Charonne Jenkins
Defendant:
Gulf Intermodal Services, L.L.C., Park Avenue Intermodal, L.L.C. and ExxonMobil Product Solutions, incorrectly named as ExxonMobil Chemical Company
Franklin v. Parkway Realty As AG/ F/Bear Claw LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jalissa Franklin
Defendant:
Parkway Realty, Winston, Winston Jenkins & Chastain LLC and Shera C Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Rashad Jenkins
Defendant:
Audwon Green and Mr. Screws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Cedric Orlando Young
Defendant:
Bonner, S Mitchell, Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
