Cases 21 - 30 of 6,439
Serrant v. Enqi Real & all constituents et al
as 2:2024cv11351
Plaintiff:
Crystal Serrant
Defendant:
Enqi Real & all constituents, Ann M. Tobin-Levigne, Ann M. Tobin-Levigne P.C. and others
Harper v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02791
Plaintiff:
Betty Harper
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON et al v. VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
as 2:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ANDERSON, STANLEY BATTLE, JR., ALONDA BORDLEY and others
Defendant:
VISIONQUEST NATIONAL, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Boggs et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03929
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Becky Boggs, Jane Cox, David Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Gastelum v. Butte County, et al.,
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Cesar Gastelum
Defendant:
Butte County, Tristan Harper and Patrick McNelis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harper v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02576
Plaintiff:
Donna Gail Harper
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lawrence v. St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lawrence
Defendant:
Detective Shattick, St. Lawrence County Correctional Facility Sheriff's Office, Deputy Yerdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
