Cases 21 - 30 of 34,081
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Robinson v. Burks-Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Robinson
Defendant:
Nurse Unknown Burks-Jones, Dr. R. Martinez, MD, N.P. Devers and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Alvarez-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3620
Petitioner:
MIRIAN ALVAREZ-MARTINEZ and ELENA ARGUETA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cosby v. Banuelos, et al
as 24-1247
Petitioner:
GREGORY D. COSBY, AKA Gregory D. Crosby
Respondent:
M. BANUELOS, DHO Officer, A. CIOLLI, Warden, J. POTTER, Correctional Officer and others
Diaz Martinez v. Pho Saigon Pearl, LLC
as 1:2024cv00997
Plaintiff:
Jose Misael Diaz Martinez
Defendant:
Pho Saigon Pearl, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marquez et al v. Federal Emergency Management
as 1:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Spring Victoria Marquez, Diane Lee Martinez, Rico Martinez and others
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv02909
Plaintiff:
Abel Garcia and Leonardo Martinez
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The, Christopher Papaionnou, Dante Koeppen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Martinez-Brilia
as 24-20153
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Edwin Martinez-Brilia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
