Cases 21 - 30 of 128
Davis v. The State et al
as 1:2022cv02800
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Andrew Davis
Defendant:
The State and Fulton County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2144
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00810
Plaintiff:
Abner, Carl Abner, Donna Adair and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Petitioner:
Lloyd Dixon, III
Abner et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Carl Abner, Donna Adair, Jason Adams and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
United States of America v. Davis
as 22-639
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Shanice Goffe and Paul Blake
Defendant / Appellant:
Andrew Davis, AKA Steven Williams, AKA Andrew Carter, AKA Cordel Freckleton, AKA Jeremy Belk, AKA Big Man
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv01487
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain, Manetirony et al v. Farrow, Paul et al
as 3:2021cv00819
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Paul Farrow, Gerard Randall, Jesse Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Davis-Bey v. Dart
as 1:2021cv05538
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Andrew Davis-Bey
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Arizona Superior Court of Pima County et al
as 4:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rose Williams
Defendant:
Arizona Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct, Paul E Tang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
